OVAS

Aquarist Forums => Freshwater General Discussions => Plants => Topic started by: magnosis on February 18, 2011, 04:34:24 PM

Title: lighting period vs output
Post by: magnosis on February 18, 2011, 04:34:24 PM
Sometimes people will advise that I reduce the photo-period (duration of lights turned on) to help fight algae.

On the other hand, some of the plants I would like to grow demand for much more lights than I'm providing at the moment.

Will these light-demanding plants strive with a higher light output, but for a shorter duration ?  I would like to add maybe 1 wpg on top of what I have (1.6-ish) but at the same time, don't want to end up with exponentially more algae...
Title: Re: lighting period vs output
Post by: asmackay on February 18, 2011, 06:12:25 PM
You're better off with a multi bulb ballast that gives you power control over the bulbs so you can run more watts as a burst for 1 or 2 hours in a normal photo period.  Lots of Co2 and ferts keeps algae away even with higher intensity lights.  I run at 1.44 wpg with a 2.8 wpg burst for an hour.
Title: Re: lighting period vs output
Post by: ray on February 19, 2011, 03:16:55 PM
While I don't keep plants,I know that the quality of reflectors used will make a huge difference in the intensity of light directed down.The old watt per gallon is no longer a rule of thumb depending on type of bulbs and reflectors used.